Watch PHX PD chief face tough questions about ‘Brady’ list (2024)

PHOENIX — The Phoenix Police Department routinely delayed sending misconduct files to prosecutors for at least 100 “Brady” list officers for hundreds of days on average, according to an expert’s statistical analysis of past cases.

The delays – usually months, and sometimes a year or more -- mean many defendants over a decade likely did not receive constitutionally required exculpatory evidence before accepting pleas or going to trial.

One of those defendants is Frances Salazar, who is suing the city.

She was wrongfully convicted in August 2016 because evidence of her arresting officer’s history of dishonesty was never disclosed before trial.

“The reality is [Phoenix’s] policies, in addition to known problems with an officer they consistently failed to hold accountable, denied Ms. Salazar her right to a fair trial, and resulted in the wrongful incarceration of a legally innocent woman for nearly two years,” according to a recent motion filed by Salazar’s attorney as part of her federal lawsuit against the city.

In 1963, the U.S. Supreme Court in Brady v. Maryland ruled that police and prosecutors cannot withhold exculpatory evidence, including past cases of dishonesty and other misconduct by officers.

As a result, prosecutors began tracking problematic officers by creating “Brady” lists.

But ABC15’s ongoing “Full Disclosure” investigation found the system for tracking those officers in Arizona is deeply flawed. Arizona county attorney’s offices almost exclusively rely on police departments to voluntarily report cops for inclusion.

Salazar’s attorney hired an expert, Dr. Melissa Kovacs, to analyze a decade of Brady list cases (112) for 10 years (2006 – 2016) proceeding her wrongful conviction.

The expert’s analysis found it took:

  • 476 days, on average, for an officer to be placed on the “Brady” list following an allegation.
  • 200 days, on average, for Phoenix to report an officer to prosecutors for “Brady” list consideration after an internal investigation was concluded.

ABC15 obtained a 3.5-hour video of Phoenix Chief Jeri Williams being deposed in the Salazar case. [A transcript of Williams’s deposition is embedded at the end of this report.]

Williams was questioned repeatedly by Salazar’s attorneys about the delays cited in the expert’s report. The chief declined to comment directly on the findings or hypothetical situations posed about those delays.

“We are looking at a report that’s the opinion of an individual that you all hired,” Williams testified. “Again, this is the first time I’ve seen this report.”

Watch PHX PD chief face tough questions about ‘Brady’ list (1)

KNXV

In court motions, Phoenix’s attorneys have not disputed Kovacs’s analysis in court filings. Instead, the city filed an opinion from a separate expert, who called the findings “irrelevant to generally accepted police policies and practices.”

In a statement for this report, a police spokesperson also did not challenge the statistics and wrote, “The time period which is the subject of the analysis is before Chief Williams’ tenure.”

Williams and Salazar’s attorney sometimes clashed during the deposition.

One of the more tense moments occurred when Williams was asked multiple times to explain what she would consider a “timely” disclosure of “Brady” material.

The chief wouldn’t provide a specific timeframe, saying it would depend on many factors. She also said she trusts her staff to handle and understand the issues.

Williams declined to directly answer questions about whether the delay that caused Salazar’s wrongful conviction was appropriate.

“So in April of 2016, I wasn’t the police chief,” Williams said. “So I’m going to put that on the record again. Someone else was the police chief. Again, I don’t know how long it takes [the Professional Standards Bureau] to finalize the investigation and get the information to [the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office].”

Watch PHX PD chief face tough questions about ‘Brady’ list (2)

KNXV

Salazar was arrested, charged, and convicted for a drug possession charge based solely on the word of a single police officer, Anthony Armour. He was not wearing a body camera and Salazar was never drug tested.

The year before Salazar’s trial, a police supervisor accused Armour of falsely arresting another woman and then lying about it. A department internal investigation confirmed Armour’s dishonesty 105 days before her trial but it was never disclosed, records show.

An ABC15 investigation further found Armour, who retired under an accidental disability claim, had a long history of discipline and misconduct allegations. Multiple women have accused him of sexual assault, including a fellow officer in 2010.

A police spokesperson said the “Brady” reporting “process is currently taking less than 30 days.”

Following the initial publication of this report, the department provided information to support the 30-day figure for nine cases reported over the past seven months.

During the deposition, Williams also dismissively responded to a question when asked what she knew about Salazar, a wrongfully convicted citizen in her city, whose case has made repeated headlines and was even the topic of a previous ABC15 interview with the chief.

At first, Williams answered, “Do I know anything about who and who?” The chief then said, “No, other than she’s suing me.”

The city’s attorneys also unsuccessfully tried to subpoena ABC15’s raw reporting on Salazar’s case.

Williams recently announced her intention to retire this summer.

Her tenure as chief has been controversial, and she will leave Phoenix in the middle of multiple ongoing scandals.

The city is also facing a sweeping Department of Justice pattern or practice investigation.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This report is a continuation of ABC15’s “Full Disclosure” investigation. Chief Investigative Reporter Dave Biscobing is the only person to ever compile acomprehensive statewide “Brady” list, and he’s in the process of updating the public database. ABC15 will air more reports about the police chief’s deposition, Phoenix’s reporting delays, and other “Brady” cases in the coming days. A transcript of Williams’s deposition is below. Dave Biscobing can be contacted at Dave@ABC15.com.]

Copyright 2022 Scripps Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Report a typo

Sign up for the Headlines Newsletter and receive up to date information.

now signed up to receive the Headlines Newsletter.

Click here to manage all Newsletters

Watch PHX PD chief face tough questions about ‘Brady’ list (2024)

FAQs

Did Phoenix settle wrongful conviction lawsuit that exposed Brady list failures? ›

Phoenix settles wrongful conviction lawsuit that exposed 'Brady' list failures. A woman wrongfully convicted after Phoenix police failed to disclose the arresting officer's history of lying has settled her case for $650,000.

What is the Brady list law in Arizona? ›

What is the Arizona Brady List, sometimes referred to as the Brady Disclosure? The Arizona Brady List is a public disclosure of police misconduct and exculpatory evidence. This system was established by HB2114, Arizona's latest law enacted to ensure the safety of the public.

Does Arizona provide compensation for wrongfully convicted persons? ›

Interesting facts about The Arizona Justice Project

Since the Arizona Justice Project was formed, we have worked to free 43 individuals from incarceration. Thirty-five states provide some form of compensation for the wrongfully convicted. Unfortunately, Arizona is not one of them.

What happened in the Brady case? ›

In Brady v. Maryland (1963), the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the issue of prosecutors suppressing evidence favorable to the accused. Maryland juries convicted John Brady and his companion of first-degree murder and sentenced them to death in separate trials. During his trial, Brady admitted he took part in the crime.

What is the rule 69 in Arizona? ›

A Rule 69 Agreement allows the parties to settle some or all of their disputes privately, leaving only the unresolved issues to be resolved by the family law court. Common disputes settled ahead of divorce trial proceedings are visitation, parenting time, child support, and how to divide assets.

What must be disclosed under Brady? ›

THE BRADY RULE

A deputy has an affirmative duty to disclose all favorable material evidence on the issue of guilt or punishment possessed by the prosecution team, irrespective of a defense request.

What can get you on the Brady list? ›

A Giglio or Brady list is a list compiled usually by a prosecutor's office or a police department containing the names and details of law enforcement officers who have had sustained incidents of untruthfulness, criminal convictions, candor issues, or some other type of issue placing their credibility into question.

What does brady listed mean? ›

A Giglio or Brady list is a list compiled usually by a prosecutor's office or a police department containing the names and details of law enforcement officers who have had sustained incidents of untruthfulness, criminal convictions, candor issues, or some other type of issue placing their credibility into question.

Is the Brady list public? ›

The Brady List is the definitive public-facing platform of record for information about officer misconduct, decertification, public complaints, use-of-force reports, do-not-call listings [Giglio letter], and more potential impeachment disclosures.

What is the Oklahoma Brady list? ›

The Oklahoma Brady List includes all known issues of police misconduct, do not call status, decertification, public complaints, use-of-force reports, and citizen reports.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Tuan Roob DDS

Last Updated:

Views: 5983

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (42 voted)

Reviews: 89% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Tuan Roob DDS

Birthday: 1999-11-20

Address: Suite 592 642 Pfannerstill Island, South Keila, LA 74970-3076

Phone: +9617721773649

Job: Marketing Producer

Hobby: Skydiving, Flag Football, Knitting, Running, Lego building, Hunting, Juggling

Introduction: My name is Tuan Roob DDS, I am a friendly, good, energetic, faithful, fantastic, gentle, enchanting person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.